Airline Blogger 777 Awaits Takeoff at ORD

Keep the RNP Parade Coming

October 29th, 2009 · ATC, FAA

RNP (Required Navigational Performance) is slowly trickling out among airlines and airports.  The program uses higher precision satellite guidance to allow aircraft to fly precision approaches through the use of GPS.

Currently, aircraft fly precision guided approaches by getting directions to the approach course from air traffic control, and then they use a ground based radio navigation beacon which guides them down to the runway.  This system is very precise, however aircraft must be within a certain alignment for it to work properly, and all of the equipment on the ground must be functional.

RNP will allow the same aircraft a precision course, descent rate, and approach all through the use of the aircraft’s on board high-precision GPS.  This precision will lead to shorter flight lengths (Southwest estimates at least a 3 mile savings per flight) and more fuel savings, along with a higher level of safety.

Share with:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • Twitter

→ No CommentsTags:·····

Is First Class still alive in the US?

October 28th, 2009 · Off Duty

I have been taking an informal survey about the recent moves by a few major US carriers to automatically upgrade frequent fliers to first class based on their mileage status.  Most airline employees I’ve spoken to seem to think that this is a terrible move which will only promote those who would normally buy a more expensive seat to purchase a cheaper one and count on the upgrade.

One question that kept coming up was whether the upgrade was really worth it anymore.  Gone largely unnoticed since most of the general public doesn’t fly premium class, most first class offerings in the US have gone downhill.

Take Delta, it has completely done away with First Class and has now replaced it with Business Class on all aircraft.  While Delta’s Business Class is comparable to most first class cabins, it allows them to be a little more flexible on offerings by not offering a first class.

Hot food, warm towels, hot nuts, and friendly flight attendants are gone.  Replaced by a single free drink (not because of a limit, just because they don’t come back to refill you) and a snack mix of peanuts and pretzels.

What’s your opinion?  Found a first class that’s worth the  money? Let me know.

Share with:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • Twitter

→ No CommentsTags:······

United after the 737

October 28th, 2009 · Airlines, Business

Today is United’s last 737 flight before it retires the fleet.  The 737 was a short-haul workhorse, first starting their Shuttle service on the west coast, and continuing in shorter segments since.  Instead of continuing on with the 737, United opted for the cheaper Airbus A319 and A320.

Now with the 737 gone, United has completed its goal of shrinking its mainline fleet by over 100 aircraft.  The question now remains: Where will Untied go in the future?

The latest numbers I saw last week showed that just over 50% of United’s daily schedule is flown by United Express contract carriers.  With this kind of outsourcing, United is on its way to becoming nothing more than a brand name, flown entirely by contract carriers, except for international flights.

That being said, United is down to 5 fleet types, much better than most of its competitors who fly outlandishly large numbers of different aircraft.  This could be a turning point if United can effectively use aircraft on the appropriate routes and increase yield.  Right now flying an A320 to Des Moines doesn’t seem like a smart move when they can’t even fill the regional jets flying there.

Most likely, the status quo will continue, and the top executives will get massive bonuses for cutting costs.  Labor will suffer, and the cycle of mediocrity at United will continue.  Glenn Tilton has no desire to make United great, he just wants to make a great deal of cash

Share with:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • Twitter

→ No CommentsTags:·········

Has anyone used Logten Mobile?

October 27th, 2009 · Off Duty, iPhone

I am looking at getting Logten Mobile from Coradine Aviation Systems for my iPhone.  It looks like a pretty slick piece of software for computing legalities, type of flight time, and exporting it all to my desktop.

My only concern is that I currently use Logbook Pro from NC Software and have grown accustomed to the interface and how to add flights.  Logten Mobile claims to be able to export to CSV for import to Logbook Pro, but I’m not sure how easy the interface would be.

Has anyone out there used Logten Mobile?  Anyone used it with Logbook Pro?  I would love to hear any stories about its use.

Share with:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • Twitter

→ No CommentsTags:·····

What if the pilot’s didn’t fall asleep?

October 27th, 2009 · Airlines, Rumor

A blog post by the “Airline Biz Blog” at the Dallas Morning News illustrates the complete ignorance of the news media when it comes to airline topics:

“I’m not a pilot so take it all with the usual caveats, but I’m having a hard time figuring out how two extremely seasoned professional pilots managed to “not hear” or “drown out” repeated voice messaging and made no radio calls… FOR SEVENTY-EIGHT MINUTES.My gut is with Fallows: The guys were asleep. It’s the only logical explanation and the laptop thing doesn’t fly with me. Pilots have strong opinions about just about everything (which is why we want them in the cockpit taking action) but I can’t see the vagaries of crew scheduling so deeply entrancing these guys for nearly 1 hour and twenty minutes.”

First things first.  The reporter is agreeing with James Fallows, a private pilot, and reporter for The Atlantic, not a professional pilot.  Perhaps a more credible source would lead to better reporting.

Is it really that hard to believe that two people can get so engrossed in a subject as to drown out the noise around them?  I was having a simple conversation with my fellow pilot in the flight deck and we flew 100 miles beyond the range of the controller we were listening to.  We weren’t sure if it was our fault or theirs, but it took several minutes to find a frequency and re-establish contact.

Once you fly beyond the transmitter range of a controller, you cannot hear the controller anymore, but you can hear other aircraft talking to them.  Airline pilots often tune out anything that does not start with their call-sign, so if you don’t hear your call-sign you often don’t listen to the transmission.

Listen in to any center control frequency on any day and you will find hundreds of instances of controllers having to repeatedly call aircraft for a response.  Many large aircraft do not have an intercom system between the pilots, so while at cruise they use the overhead speaker and take off their headsets to make conversation easier.  This has the effect of making the radio into background noise.

I can easily see how 2 pilots engaged in a spirited conversation and using their computers could miss radio traffic.

Finally, crew scheduling is the most heated topic of any airline flight deck.  Airline crews have an almost universal disgust with scheduling, and it leads to conversations well over 78 minutes.

Original post: http://aviationblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/10/78-minutes-of-radio-silence-on.html

Share with:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • Twitter

→ No CommentsTags:·······